ANALISA PENYEBAB MASALAH MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN COHESIVE DEVICES DALAM MENULIS TEKS ANALITIKAL EKSPOSISI

Main Article Content

Aprida irma yana Lollo Rosa Lubis

Abstract

This research aims to explain the factors of the students’ causes problems in using cohesive devices in writing analytical expository text, they are reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. This research is a kind of  qualitative method which is purposed to understand the factors that causes of students’ problems. The data were the fourth semester students of English department of Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan. The sample were consisting of 40 students. The technique in getting sample was total sampling. The finding shows that the quality of students’ writing was in the level of low category. They have problems in using cohesive devices. The problems are related to the use of reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. The reason of the problems in using cohesive devices in writing is based on linguistic, pragmatic, cognitive and cultural factor. Four of them give influence that causes the lack cohesive writing. Therefore, an intensive attention should be given by the lecture to facilitate the students to practice writing in the classroom and do peer correction.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
A. yana and L. Lubis, “ANALISA PENYEBAB MASALAH MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN COHESIVE DEVICES DALAM MENULIS TEKS ANALITIKAL EKSPOSISI”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 38, Jan. 2019.
Section
Artikel

References

Al-Jarf, R. 2006The Difficulty of Teaching EnglishWriting Courses to Arab Students:Readers, King Saud University.Bailey. M. Hellen.2014. Academic Journal;StudyAid, Creating Coherent ParagraphsEast Lost Angeles College HellenMiller Library.www.elac.edu/departments/library/library.Retrieved on December 3, 2014.7.30.p.m.Besma Azous (2009).A Discourse Analysis ofGrammatical Cohesive devices inStudents’ Writing.Mentouri University-ConstantineBloor and Bloor. 2004.The functional Analysis ofEnglish.London: Edward ArnoldBrown, H.D. 2004.Language Assessment Principleand Classroom Practice. San Fransisco: Pearson Education. Inc.Callaghan. 1985.Second language Writing.Cambridge: Cambridge Universitypress.Djuharie, O.S. 2007.Genre.Bandung : YramaWidyaDulay , H.,Burt, , M.Krashen S. 1982.LanguageTwo.New York: Open University Press.Gay, R. L., and Airasian. 2000.EducationalResearch.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Hinkel, E.2001.Culture in Research and SecondLanguage Pedagogy: Culture andLanguage. In E.Hinkle (Ed).,Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPressLili, Luo. 2002.Causesof Problems with cohesivedevices in English Writing andSomeCorresponding Suggestions:ForeignLanguage School. Zhejiang WanliUniveristy, P.R.ChinaMoe, AJ. October 1979.Cohesion, coherence, andthe comprehension of text.Journal ofreading' 16-20.Moleong, Lexy J. 2010.Metodology penelitiankualitatif.Bandung: Rosdakarya.Nunan, D. (2005).Second language teaching andlearning. Boston: Heinle and HeinlePublishers.