ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PENJATUHAN PIDANA DI BAWAH ANCAMAN MINIMUM KEPADA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Corruption in Indonesia has become widespread. Its development continues to increase from year to year, both in the number of cases that occur, the amount of state financial losses and in terms of the quality of criminal acts committed more systematically and have entered all aspects of public life. Corruption is an extraordinary crime, so extraordinary handling is also needed and extraordinary measures are also needed. In handling these crimes, adequate law enforcement is needed, namely judges in imposing penalties by giving the heaviest sanctions to the perpetrators. The maximum sentence imposed as a form of deterrent effect both to the perpetrators themselves and to others. Based on this, the purpose of this research is to know and analyze the basis of judges' judgment in dropping criminal decisions under the minimum threat to the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. This study uses a type of normative juridical research with an approach to the legislation in force. And the data used are secondary data, with data analysis is descriptive qualitative data analysis. Based on the results of the study showed that the basic consideration of judges in passing criminal decisions under the minimum threat to the perpetrators of corruption is that in proving corruption acts, judges are based on the theory of the negative verification system implied in Article 183 KUHAP (of the Criminal Procedure Code), which before giving a criminal verdict, the judge must consider the legal basis, and the non-juridical basis, and the judge considers the philosophical basis, while the judge in imposing a crime under the minimum threat to the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is based on desert theory or proportionality theory, namely penalties or penalties imposed by the judge considers the size of the state financial loss caused by the defendant with the facts that are revealed in court and other matters that are alleviating the actions of the accused during the trial process.
Article Details
References
Sianturi S.R, dan Mompang L. Panggabean, 1996, Hukum Penitensia Di Indonesia, Penerbit Alumni Ahaem-Peterhaem, Jakarta.
Arief, Barda Nawawi, 2002, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Chaerudin, 2008, Strategi Pencegahan dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Supardi H., 2018, Perampasan Harta Hasil Korupsi Perspektif Hukum Pidana yang Berkeadilan, Penerbit Prenadamedia Grup, Jakarta Timur.
_______, 2008, Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Djaja, Ermansjah, 2008, Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarata.
Harahap, Yahya, 2008, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali), Edisi Kedua, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Hamzah, Andi, (II), 1998, Korupsi di Indonesia Masalah dan Pemecahannya, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Kartanegara, Satochid, t.t , Hukum Pidana, Kumpulan Kuliah dan Pendapat-pendapat Para Ahli Hukum Terkemuka, Bagian Kedua, Penerbit Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Jakarta.
Alfitra, 2012, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Beracara Pidana, Perdata dan Korupsi Di Indonesia, Penerbit Raih Asa Sukses (Penebar Swadaya Grup), Jakarta.
Lubis, Mochtar dan C. Scott James, 1998, Bunga Rampai Korupsi, Cet. ke-3, LP3ES, Jakarta.
Moeljatno, 2008, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, (Edisi Revisi), Penerbit Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Marpaung, Leden, 1992, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Panjaitan, Iwan Petrus, 1995, Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
Pradjonggo, Sridjaja Tjandra, 2010, Sifat Melawan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Indonesia Lawyer Club, Surabaya.
Prinsts, Darwan, 1997, Hukum Anak Indonesia, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman, 2009, Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Delik Korupsi UU No. 31 Tahun 1999, CV Mandar Madju, Bandung.
Sianturi, S.R., 2002, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Penerbit Alumni Ahem. Petehaem, Jakarta.
Soesilo, R., 1984, Tugas dan Kewajiban Serta Wewenang Penyidik Jaksa dan Hakim, Politeia, Bogor.
Syamsudin, Aziz, 2011, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Yudowidagdo, Hendrastanto, 2001, Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bina Aksara, Bandung.
Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
_______, Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
_______,Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberatasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
_______, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
_______, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
www.rima.com/korupsi-dan-koruptor-agar-perdebatan-tidak-kotor.httm, Submitted by redaksi on Tue, di Akses hari Jumaat tanggal 24 Januari 2020.
http://blogs.pidana-penjara-seumur-hidup.com, di Akses hari Jumat, Tanggal 24 Januari 2020.