DEIXIS IN CHARLES DICKEN’S GREAT EXPECTATION

Main Article Content

Mohamad Yunus Laia

Abstract

This research aimed to know the types of deixis and how they used in the novel of Charles Dicken’s Great Expectation. The terms of deixis is not familiar to the learners of English although they use it both in spoken and written language. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach. This research is categorized as descriptive qualitative research since the data are taken from words, phrases, and sentences based on deixis theory. Based on the data analysis and discussion are three types of deixis, they are person deixis, place deixis, and time deixis. Firstly, the result shows that person deixis dominates the most by means of emergences 207 times and the percentage is 67.21%. The person deixis is encoded by pronouns either plural or singular which reflect all characters in the novel and the referents could be speaker (first person), addressee (second person) and other participants (third person). In this novel, Pip, as the main character is highly often found since Dicken uses first- person point of view. Secondly, place deixis shows 58 times and the percentage is 18.83%. Demonstrative pronoun and adverb of place definitely encode place deixis which is centralized in and around England. Thirdly, time deixis appears the least from the others, it indicates 43 times and the percentage is 13.96%. Time deixis is symbolized by words and phrase adverb of time. Most referents of time deixis are past events.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
M. Laia, “DEIXIS IN CHARLES DICKEN’S GREAT EXPECTATION”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 332, May 2020.
Section
Artikel

References

Brown, Gillian. 1996. Speakers, Listeners, and Communication: Explorations in Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. & Gregory Ward. 2006. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hurford, James R. & Brendan Heasley. 1984. Semantics: A Course book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics. London: Pearson Education.
Keenan, Edward L. 1975. Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, X.J. 1966. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Canada: Little, Brown and Company.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. California: Sage Publication.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F.R. 1981. Semantics: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Peck, J. & M. Coyle. 1993. Literary Terms and Criticism. London: Macmillan.
http://www.change.freeuk.com/learning/concepts/noveltype.html (Downloaded on Thursday, April 29, 2011 12:47 PM)
Pickering, James H. & Jeffrey D. Hoeper. 1981. Concise Companion to Literature. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Rankema, Jan. 1993. Discourse Studies: An Introductory Text Book. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Sarwono, Jonathan. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Strauss, Anselm. & Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
Summers, Della, et al. 2006. Longman: Dictionary of Contemporary English. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
Yerkes, David, et al. 2003. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary: Eleventh Edition. Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster