PROFIL KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA ARTIKEL PENELITIAN MAHASISWA PASCASARJANA TAHUN PERTAMA PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG

Article Sidebar

Download/Lihat PDF
Published Aug 2, 2020
DOI https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v8i3.1872

Main Article Content

Amining Rahmasiwi
IAIN Surakarta

Abstract

Artikel penelitian memfasilitasi seseorang untuk belajar menganalisis data, merumuskan kesimpulan, dan mengidentifikasi tindak lanjut arah penelitian selayaknya proses yang dilakukan oleh ilmuwan sehingga penting untuk menguasai kemampuan membaca artikel penelitian. Kemampuan membaca artikel penelitian penting untuk dikembangkan, termasuk bagi mahasiswa tahun pertama untuk mempersiapkan segala keterampilan dan kemampuan dalam penulisan tugas akhir nantinya. Kemampuan membaca artikel penelitian diukur berdasarkan kemampuan dalam  mengidentifikasi rethorical moves artikel. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan membaca artikel penelitian mahasiswa pascasarjana tahun pertama Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah survey dengan sampel mahasiswa sebanyak 63. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan membaca artikel penelitian dari mahasiswa pascarjana tahun pertama Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang  termasuk pada level rendah dilihat dari rendahnya kemampuan dalam  mengidentifikasi rethorical moves artikel. Aspek yang paling mudah diidentifikasi oleh mahasiswa yaitu objective (jawaban benar 50,79%) dan motive (jawaban benar 34,92%), sedangkan aspek yang sulit diidentifikasi yaitu conclusion (jawaban benar 22,22%), implication (jawaban benar 28,52%), counterargument (jawaban benar 25,40%), dan refutation (jawaban benar 19,05%).

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
A. Rahmasiwi, “PROFIL KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA ARTIKEL PENELITIAN MAHASISWA PASCASARJANA TAHUN PERTAMA PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 64, Aug. 2020.
Issue
Vol 8 No 3 (2020): Vol.8.No.3.2020
Section
Artikel

References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2009. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biologu Education, A Call to Action. Wachington, AAAS Excutive Publisher.
Arsyad, S & Wardhana, D.E.C. 2014. Introduction in Indonesia Social Science and Humanities Research Articles, How Indonesian Writers Justify their Research Project. Linguistik Indonesia. 32(2), 149-163.
Chotitham, S., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. 2014. Development of the Engaged Learning in Reading Reearch Article. Procedia Social Behavioral Science. 171, 1325-1329.
Dunifon, R (2005). How to Read a Research Article. Cornell University Cooperation Extension.
Goldman, S.R. & Bisanz, G.I. 2002. Toward Functional Analysis of Scientific Genres: Implication for Understanding and Learning Process. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilmore, J & Feldon, D. 2010. Measuring Graduate Students’ Teaching and Research Skill through Self-Report, Descriptive Finding and Validty Evidence. Paper dipresentasikan dalam Pertemuan Tahunan dalam American Eduational Research Association, Denver, Co, 30 April-4 Mei.
Gillen, C.M. 2006. Critism and Interpretation: Teaching the Persuasive Aspect of Research Articles. CBE-Life Science Education.
Healey, W., Jenkin,s, A., & Lea, J. 2014. Developing Research-Based Curricula in College-Based Higher Education. UK, The Higher Education Academy.
Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kolokant,Y.B.D., Gatchell, D.W., Hirsch, P.L., & Linsenmeier, R.A. 2006. A cognitive-apprenticeship-inspired instructional approach for teaching scientific writing and reading. Journal College Science Teaching. 36, 20–25.
Lacum, E.B., Ossevort, M., & Goedhart, M.J. 2014. A teaching Strategy with a Focus on Argumentation to Imporve Undergraduate Student Ability to Read Research Articles. CBE life Science Edcucation. 13, 253-264.
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. 2008. The Role of Self Efficacy, Task Value, and Achievement Goal in Predicting Cognitiff Engagement, Task Disangagemetn, Peer Relationship, and Achievement Outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 33, 486-512.
Lacum, E. V.,Koeneman, M., Ossevort, M., & Goedhart, M. 2016.Scientific Argumentation Model (SAM), A Heuristic for Reading research Article by Science Student. Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Norris, S.P & Phillips, L.M. 2003. How Literacy in its Fundamental Sense is Central to Scientific Literacy. Journal of Science Education. 87, 224-240.
Reis, S.M., Eckert, R.D., McCoach, D.B., Coyne, M. 2008. Using Enrichment Reading Practice to Increas Reading Fluency, Comprehension, and Attitude. The Journal of Education Research. 101, 299-315.
Shi, H & Wannaruk, A. 2014. Rhetorical Structure of Research Article in Agricultural Science. English Language Teaching. 7 (8), 1-13.
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. 2009. Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns. Aslib Proceeding. 61(1), 5-32.
Udompong, L., Traiwichitkhun, D. & Wongwanich, S. 2013. Causal Model of Research Competency via Scientific Literacy of Teacher and. Student. Social and Behavioral Science, (Online), 116(2014): 1581-1586, (http://www.sciencedirect.com), diakses 4 Maret 2017.
Van Lacum, E., Ossevort, M., Buikema, H., Goedhart, M. 2012. First Experience with Reading Primary Literature by Undergraduate Life Science Students. International Jorunal Science Education. 34, 1795-1821.
Wuttiprom, S., Wuttisela, K., Phonchaiya, S., Athiwaspong, W., Chitaree., & Sharma. M.D. 2016. Preliminary Result of Professional Development Program for School Science Research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 842-848.
Woodin, T., Carter, V.C., & Flecther, L. 2010. Vision and Change in Biology Undergraduate Education, A Call for Action-Initial Response. Journal of Life Science Education. 9, 71-73.
Yarden, A., Norris, P. S., & Phillips, L.M. 2015. Adapted Primary Literature, the Use of Authentic Scientific Texts in Secondary Schools. 5, 34-38.