PEER EDITING IN EFL WRITING CLASSROOM

Main Article Content

Erna Sulistyawati Syafi’ul Anam Ali Mustofa

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penerapan teknik peer editing dalam mengajar teks deskripsi  serta untuk mengetahui persepsi peserta didik tentang penerapan teknik peer editing yang dilakukan pada siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Surabaya. Peer editing atau koreksi antar teman sejawat diterapkan pada hasil tulisan siswa sebanyak dua sesi. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode observasi, dokumentasi dan wawancara. Observasi dilakukan untuk mengetahui penerapan teknik peer editing yang dilakukan guru dan pesrta didik selama pembelajaran. Dokumentasi dilakukan untuk mengetahui aspek-aspek menulis yang dikoreksi oleh peserta didik melalui hasil tulisan siswa yang telah diedit. Wawancara dilakukan setelah pelaksanaan peer editing untuk mengetahui pendapat peserta didik tentang manfaat yang mereka dapatkan setelah mempelajari teks deskripsi dengan menggunakan teknik peer editing.  Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualititatif. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dalam mengajar teks deskripsi dengan teknik peer editing, guru melakukan tiga tahap utama yaitu pertama tahap persiapan, kedua tahap ketika mengedit, dan yang ketiga tahap sesudah mengedit. Persepsi sebagian besar peserta didik terhadap teknik peer editing adalah positif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa dengan bimbingan guru, peserta didik dapat memberikan koreksi yang tepat pada tulisan temannya sehingga mempermudah tugas guru dalam hal mengoreksi tugas siswa. Pesera didik berpendapat bahwa peer editing sangat bermanfaat dan sangat membatu untuk meningkatkan kualitas tulisan mereka

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
E. Sulistyawati, S. Anam, and A. Mustofa, “PEER EDITING IN EFL WRITING CLASSROOM”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 242, Aug. 2020.
Section
Artikel

References

AbuSeileek, A., & Abualsha’r, A. (2014) Using peer computer-mediated corrective feedback to support EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1), 76–95.
Al-Nafiseh, K. I. (2013). Collaborative writing and peer-editing in EFL writing classes. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(2), 236.
Ariyanti, A. (2016). Shaping Students' Writing Skills: The Study of Fundamental Aspects of Mastering Academic Writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 63-77.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2015). Skills for the 21st Century: What Should Student Learn. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Vol. Second Edition). San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University
Chang, C. F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 63-78.
Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38(1), 85-95.
Díaz Galvis, N. M. (2010). Peer editing: A strategic source in EFL students' writing process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(1).
Fatoni, Mohammad. (2016). The Use of Peer Response on writing Narrative Texts Based on 2013 Curriculum. Thesis Unpublished. Surabaya: Postgraduate Program of State University of Surabaya.
Gomez, O., & McDougald, J. (2013). Developing writing through blogs and peer feedback. Ikala, Revista de language y Cultura, 18(3), 45-61.
Karegianes, M. J., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1980). The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(4), 203-207.
Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, Vol. 44 (4), 294-304.
Kemdikbud. (2017). Model Silabus Mata Pelajaran SekolahMenengahPertama/MadrasahTsanawiyah (SMP/MTs). Jakarta: Kemdikbud Press.
Knapp, P. (1992) Resource Book for Genre and Grammar, Metropolitan West Literacy and Learning Program, Parramatta: NSW Dept of School Education.
Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students' perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55,1-10.
Li, M., & Li, J. (2017). Online peer review using Turnitin in first-year writing classes. Computers and Composition, 46, 21-38.
Mangelsdorf, Kate. (1992). Peer Response in the ESL Classroom : What Do the Students Think? ELT Journal, 46 (3), 274-284
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage
Moussaoui, S. (2012). An investigation of the effects of peer evaluation in enhancing Algerian student's writing autonomy and positive effect. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1775-1784
Ommaggio, A. C. (1986). Teaching language in context: proficiency-oriented instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 17, 286-479. Boston: Heinle and Heinle publishers.
Pardo-Ballester, C., & Cabello, A. C. (2016). L2 Collaborative E-writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 601-607.
Rasyidah, U., & Antoni, R. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Mahasiswa PBI semester VI Universitas Pasir Pengairan Dalam Menulis Critical Essay. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(1), 21–30.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
Susser, B. (1994). Process Approaches in ESL/EFL Writing Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3 (1), 31-47.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of a higher psychological process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2017). Adolescent ELLs' collaborative writing practices in face-to-face and online contexts: From perceptions to action. System, 65, 78-89
Yusof, J., Ab Manan, N. A., & Alias, A. A. (2012). Guided peer feedback on academic writing tasks using Facebook notes: An exploratory study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 216-228.
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3-17.