INNOVATION MANAGEMENT FROM DYNAMIC CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT LENSE IN SCHOOL SETTINGS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Main Article Content

Johan . Poltak Sinaga Rudy Pramono Niko Sudibjo

Abstract

Implementation of innovation is the main indicator of success for innovation initiatives. The challenge on dynamic capability management, particularly for innovation, has been in place and studied by scholars. Yet, research regarding this matter from a strategic level and from school leaders’ perspective is limited. Interviews conducted to school leaders in Indonesia showcase four resources to be managed for innovation in schools: human resources, technology, communication, and budget; each with their own antecedents. The focus to ensure success falls into human resources, namely willingness to adopt, understanding of the concept of teacher, comprehension level and learning speed. Meanwhile, from a technology standpoint, these antecedents include fulfillment of users’ needs, integration with applied technologies, budget fitness and hardware requirements. Communication resources and their dynamics are text and visual based communication, meeting, and surveys. Meanwhile, the dynamics surrounding the budget are fitness with purpose and school’s plan, return on investment, and external contribution. This study supports the creation of a new proposition on innovation dynamic capability management from the school's perspective. School leaders can use this research as a reference point to strategize future innovation projects.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
J. ., P. Sinaga, R. Pramono, and N. Sudibjo, “INNOVATION MANAGEMENT FROM DYNAMIC CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT LENSE IN SCHOOL SETTINGS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 468-477, Nov. 2021.
Section
Artikel

References

Altinay, F. et al. (2020) ‘The role of Edmodo model for professional development: The uses of blockchain in school management’, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(12), pp. 256–270. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i12.13571.
Campbell, J. M. and Kubickova, M. (2020) ‘Agritourism microbusinesses within a developing country economy: A resource-based view’, Journal of Destination Marketing and Management. Elsevier Ltd, 17(July), p. 100460. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100460.
Chirumalla, K. (2021) ‘Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: A dynamic capabilities approach’, Technovation. Elsevier Ltd, 105, p. 102256. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102256.
Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fifth Edit. Sage Publications, Inc.
Deppeler, J. and Aikens, K. (2020) ‘Responsible innovation in school design–a systematic review’, Journal of Responsible Innovation. Taylor & Francis, 7(3), pp. 573–597. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1809782.
Gueler, M. S. and Schneider, S. (2021) ‘The resource-based view in business ecosystems: A perspective on the determinants of a valuable resource and capability’, Journal of Business Research. Elsevier Inc., 133(April), pp. 158–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.061.
Hutton, S., Demir, R. and Eldridge, S. (2021) ‘How does open innovation contribute to the firm’s dynamic capabilities?’, Technovation. Elsevier Ltd, 106(April), p. 102288. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102288.
Kanchanabha, B. and Badir, Y. F. (2021) ‘Top management Team’s cognitive diversity and the Firm’s ambidextrous innovation capability: The mediating role of ambivalent interpretation’, Technology in Society. Elsevier Ltd, 64. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101499.
Kasper, H., Pohl, V. and Kochanowski, M. (2020) ‘Format Matters! And People do, too! Tools and Insights from an Innovation Network’, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1297, pp. 472–496. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66196-0_22.
Klein, K. J. and Sorra, J. S. (1996) ‘The challenge of innovation implementation’, Academy of Management Review, 21(4), pp. 1055–1080. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071863.
Linde, L. et al. (2021) ‘Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614.
Muskat, B. et al. (2021) ‘Innovation capability and culture: How time-orientation shapes owner-managers’ perceptions’, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47(March), pp. 217–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.03.018.
Naseer, A. et al. (2021) ‘Real-time analytics, incident response process agility and enterprise cybersecurity performance: A contingent resource-based analysis’, International Journal of Information Management. Elsevier Ltd, 59(November 2019), p. 102334. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102334.
Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Sanz-Valle, R. (2011) ‘Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture’, Management Decision, 49(1), pp. 55–72. doi: 10.1108/00251741111094437.
Pascual-Fernández, P. et al. (2021) ‘Key drivers of innovation capability in hotels: implications on performance’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94(May 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102825.
Pfeffermann, N. (2017) Revolution of innovation management, Revolution of Innovation Management. doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-95123-9.
Prokopenko, O. and Omelyanenko, V. (2018) ‘Marketing aspect of the innovation communications development’, Innovative Marketing, 14(2), pp. 41–49. doi: 10.21511/im.14(2).2018.05.
Robertson, J., Caruana, A. and Ferreira, C. (2021) ‘Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems’, International Business Review. Elsevier Ltd, (April), p. 101866. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101866.
Ruiz-Ortega, M. J. et al. (2021) ‘Innovation capability and pioneering orientation in Peru’s cultural heritage tourism destinations: Conflicting environmental effects’, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48(January), pp. 441–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.012.
Tabaklar, T. et al. (2021) ‘Exploring the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities for social innovation in a humanitarian aid supply network setting’, Industrial Marketing Management. Elsevier Inc., 96(April), pp. 147–162. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.04.012.
Teece, D. J. (2007) ‘Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance’, Strategic Management JOurnal, 28(August), pp. 1319–2350. doi: 10.1002/smj.
Teece, D. J. (2017) ‘A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (Strategic) management perspective’, New Zealand Economic Papers. Taylor & Francis, 53(1), pp. 1–43. doi: 10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208.
Vermeir, K. and Kelchtermans, G. (2021) ‘Unpacking the support practices of educational advisors: Congruency, loyalty, legitimacy, and urgency’, Journal of Educational Change, p. 10833. doi: 10.1007/s10833-021-09428-0.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘A Resource Based View of the Firm’, Strategic management journal, 5, pp. 171–180. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250050207/abstract.
Yin, R. K. (2002) ‘Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition (Applied Social Research Methods, Vol. 5)’, p. 200.
Zeng, J., Mahdi Tavalaei, M. and Khan, Z. (2021) ‘Sharing economy platform firms and their resource orchestration approaches’, Journal of Business Research. Elsevier Inc., 136(August), pp. 451–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.054.
Zhang, H. et al. (2021) ‘Discursive Communication Strategies for Introducing Innovative Products: The Content, Cohesion, and Coherence of Product Launch Presentations’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(3), pp. 369–400. doi: 10.1177/10506519211001123.
Zhao, G. et al. (2021) ‘How was teaching thinking adopted and diffused in Chinese primary schools? A qualitative study from principals’ perspectives’, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, p. 2188791. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2021.1911786.