ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS MAHASISWA SELAMA PRAKTIKUM DARING

Main Article Content

Dian Tauhidah Yuliani Farikha

Abstract

Kegiatan praktikum merupakan kegiatan pendukung pembelajaran sains. Kondisi pandemi menyebabkan kegiatan praktikum tidak dapat berjalan secara optimal. Hal tersebut dapat berdampak pada berbagai keterampilan mahasiswa termasuk keterampilan proses sains. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa selama pelaksanaan praktikum daring. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan secara deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian diambil menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan mengambil partisipan mahasiswa yang telah melaksanakan praktikum daring selama satu semester. Partisipan berjumlah 83 mahasiswa pendidikan biologi UIN Walisongo yang telah menempuh mata kuliah praktikum biokimia yang dilaksanakan secara daring. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan berupa tes yang dikembangkan dari 9 indikator keterampilan proses sains. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rerata skor keterampilan proses sains seluruh partisipan yaitu 76,63 yang termasuk dalam kategori baik. Indikator keterampilan proses sains terendah dalam penelitian ini yaitu pada indikator measuring. Indikator tertinggi dalam penelitian ini yaitu pada indikator hypothesizing dan defining and controlling variables.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
D. Tauhidah and Y. Farikha, “ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS MAHASISWA SELAMA PRAKTIKUM DARING”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 6-9, Mar. 2022.
Section
Artikel

References

Amri, S. & Ahmadi, I. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Kreatif. Dalam Kelas. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Arends, R. (2008). Learning to Teach. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bhakti, Y. B. & Astuti, A. D. (2018). The Influence Process of Science Skill and Motivation Learning with Creativity Learn. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(1): 30-35. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i1.6912
Carin, A A. (1997). Teaching Modern Science (7 Th Edition). New Jersey: Merril. Publishing Company.
Creech, C. & Shriner, W. (2020). DIY ecologi class: Transitioning field activities to an online format. Special Issue: Taking learning online in ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 10(22): 12437-12441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6656
Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Aktapianti, A. & Br.Ginting. (2021). Relationship of Science Process Skills on Critical Thinking Ability Review by Gender in Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(4): 711-735.
Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery of Teaching and Laboratory Practices: Continuity of University Programmes during COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10): 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Ismail, E. A. & Groccia, J. E. (2018). Students Engaged in Learning. Special Issue: Student Engagement: A Multidimensional Perspective, 154: 45-54.
Jones, N. (2018). Simulated labs are booming. Nature, 562, S5–S7. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06831-1
Kidd, W & Murray, J. (2020) .The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43:4, 542-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480
Kramer, M., Olson, D., & Walker, J. D. (2018). Design and Assessment of Online, Interactive Tutorials that Teach Science Process Skills. CBE-Life Science Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-06-0109
Mandasari, F., Iwan, & Damopolii, I. (2021). The relationship between science process skills and biology learning outcome. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(1): 23-32. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i1.9
Natale, C. C., Mello, P. S., Trivelato, S. L. F., Marzin-Janvier, P., & Manzoni-de-Almeida, D. (2021). Special Issue: Implication of COVID-19 on Higher Education. Evidence of Scientific Literacy Through Hybrid and Online Biology Inquiry-Based Learning Activities. Higher Learning Research Communication, 11(0): 33-49. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1199
Purba, A., Asnewastri, Gultom, S., Girsang, S. E. E., Sinaga, D. P., Saragih, R., Tansliova, L., Hulu, I. L., Nasution, T. A., Huda, M. K., Sitopu, J. W., Marini, N., & Ginting, A. M. (2021). Pengajar Profesional: Teori dan Konsep. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Ratamun, M. M. & Osman, K. (2018). The effectiveness of virtual lab compared to physical lab in the mastery of science process skills for chemistry experiment. Journal Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4): 544-560.
Rosenthal, D. B. & Bybee, R. W. (1987). The Formation of School Subjects: Emergence of the Biology Curriculum: A Science of Life or a Science of Living? London: Routledge.
Rustaman, N.Y., Dirdjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, S. A., Achmad, Y., Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., Nurjhani, M. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: UPI.
Scheckler, R. K. (2003). Virtual labs: A substitute for traditional labs? International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47(2–3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.12705675
Slavin, R. E. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Trianto. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Vigotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wenno, I. (2008). Strategi belajar mengajar sains berbasis kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Inti Media.
Yildiz, C. & Yildiz, T. G. (2021). Exploring the Relationship between Creative Thinking and Scientific Process Skills of Preschool Children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795