EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM PROTOTIPE (KEPMENDIKBUDRISTEK NO. 162/M/2021) DI UPTD SMP NEGERI 1 DATUK LIMA PULUH KABUPATEN BATUBARA DENGAN MODEL CIPP
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to significantly implement the prototype curriculum at Junior High School (SMP) level. The evaluation results from this study is expected to provide the appropriate input in the implementation of the prototype curriculum. This research was conducted at UPTD SMP Negeri 1 Datuk Lima Puluh Batubara Regency involving 21 teachers and 205 student and the evaluation model used is CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Output) by Stufflebeam. The instrument used in the study was a questionnaire compiled based on CIPP aspects and indicators on the prototype and the data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. The results of this study found that facilities and infrastructure were considered good by as many as 74.01% of teachers and students while the understanding of teachers and students as well as parental involvement is in the category of less than 47%. In addition, from the input aspect, the procurement of books received a very good response, which was 96.40%. However, less than 43% of respondents considered that the guidance provided to teachers was in the poor category and the process aspect received a poor response from respondents, which was less than 49%. A total of 69.37% of respondents gave a good response in the product aspect category. Implementation of the prototype curriculum needs to pay attention to the readiness and quality of teachers, schools, and other aspects. In addition, the class level in the prototype curriculum can be replaced with the term "phase" because learning outcomes are at the phase level and not at the class level. The expert trainers should be presented directly to schools and improvements in process aspects can be made by defining a clear role in the policy.
Article Details
References
Annisa, N., Nurfadilah, A., & Maharani, C. (2022). Kesiapan Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Prototipe Untuk Menciptakan Generasi Yang Kreatif dan Inovatif. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(2), 175-184. doi:https://doi.org/10.26618/equilibrium.v10i2.7262
Basuki. (2022). Identifikasi Materi Pembelajaran Akhlak pada Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Prototipe 2022. DUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(3), 3896-3915. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2784
Bima, L. (2021). Tiga Capaian Buruk Pendidikan di Indonesia sejak Tahun 2000.
DeFillippi, R. J. (2001). Introduction: Project-Based Learning, Reflective Practices and Learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 5-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507601321001
Faiz, A., Parhan, M., & Ananda, R. (2022). Paradigma Baru dalam Kurikulum Prototipe. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 1544-1550. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2410
Hasim, E. (2020). Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Perguruan Tinggi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Melalui Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Menuju Anak Merdeka Belajar (pp. 68-74). Gorontalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots. Higher Education, 51, 287–314.
Isnarofik, M. B. (2022). Merefresh Pendidikan Dengan Iplementasi Kurikulum Prototipe. Primary, 86-89.
Kisno, C., Tampubolon, M. R., Manalu, T. S., Berlien, R., Gulo, K. N., & Kešner, A. (2021). Teachers’ Learning Loss Diminution Through Self-Phased Learning with Guru Binar. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 24(1), 17-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.26858/ijes.v24i1.19473
Kisno, Rokhyati, U., Fatimah, F. N., & Siregar, R. M. (2021). Teachers’ Misconception about National Assessment and National Examination. ADJES (Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies), 8(1), 46-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v8i1.20081
Kisno, K., Anggraeni, C. T., Siregar, R. M., & Nainggolan, L. A. (2021). Self-Phased Learning for Reducing Teachers’ Learning Loss with Guru Binar. Tarling: Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 149-169. doi:https://doi.org/10.24090/tarling.v5i2.5241
Mendikbudristek. (2021). Kepmendikbud Ristek No. 162 tahun 2021 tentang Program Sekolah Penggerak. Kemdikbudristek .
Novianti, D. E. (2020). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Apa dan Bagaimana? Prosiding Nasional Pendidikan (pp. 70-75). Bojonegoro: LPPM IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro.
Nurasiah, I., Marini, A., Nafiah, M., & Rachmawati, N. (2022). Nilai Kearifan Lokal: Projek Paradigma Baru Program Sekolah Penggerak untuk Mewujudkan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal BasicEdu, 6(3), 3639 - 3648. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2727
Pritchett, L., & Beatty, A. (2012). The negative consequences of overambitious curricula in developing countries. Harvard: Center for Global Development Working Paper.
Puslitjak, & INOVASI. (2021). Pemulihan Pembelajaran: Waktunya untuk Bertindak. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.
Rachmawati, N., Marini, A., Nafiah, M., & Nurasiah, I. (2022). Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Impelementasi Kurikulum Prototipe di Sekolah Penggerak Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu(6), 3613-3625. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2714
Ramadhayanti, D., Siregar, M. H., & Elyza, N. (2022). Persepsi Mahasiswa Tadris Biologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (UINSU) Terkait Kurikulum 2022. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan MH Thamrin, 6(1), 13-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.37012/jipmht.v6i1.776
Rosmana, P. S., Iskandar, S., Fatimah, F. S., Aprillionita, R., Arfaiza, S. A., & Hamidah, W. (2022). Penerapan Kurikulum Prototype pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. FONDATIA, 6(1), 62-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v6i1.1706
Rosmana, P. S., Iskandar, S., Fauziah, H., Azzifah, N., & Khamelia, W. (2022). Kebebasan dalam Kurikulum Prototype. AS-SABIQUN, 4(1), 115-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v4i1.1683
Rozady, M. P., & Koten, Y. P. (2022). Scratch sebagai Problem Solving Computational Thinking dalam Kurikulum Prototipe. Increate-Inovasi Dan Kreasi Dalam Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 11-17.
Sadewa, M. A. (2022). Meninjau Kurikulum Prototipe Melalui Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(1), 266-280. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2410
Sanjaya, J. B., & Rastini, R. (2020). Implementasi Kurikulum Darurat di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Pendidikan. JIL: Journal of Indonesian Law, 1(2), 161-174. doi:10.18326/jil.v1i2.161-174
Solikhah, P. I., & Purnomo, P. (2022). The Opportunity and Challenges of Implementing a Prototype Curriculum. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 407-421. doi: https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2130
Stufflebeam, D. (2000). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In D. Stufflebeam, G. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan, Evaluation Models: Evaluation in Education and Human Services (pp. 279–317). Dordrecht: Springer.
Suhandi, A. M., & Robi'ah, F. (2022). Guru dan Tantangan Kurikulum Baru: Analisis Peran Guru dalam Kebijakan Kurikulum Baru. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6001-6010. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3172
Suryadien, D., Dini, R., & Dewi, A. A. (2022). Rencana Implementasi Kurikulum Prototipe Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Jurnal PGMI UNIGA, 1(1), 27-34.
Tazkiah, L. (2021, November 19). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Model Evaluasi CIPP. Retrieved from Topsatu: https://www.topsatu.com/mengenal-lebih-dekat-model-evaluasi-cipp/