IMPOLITENESS IN INDONESIAN HATE SPEECH ON BASUKI TJAHAJA PURNAMA (BTP) AS FOUND IN YOUTUBE COMMENTARY English

Article Sidebar

Download/Lihat PDF
Published Aug 26, 2022
DOI https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v10i3.4128

Main Article Content

Sondang Manik
Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Hilman Pardede
Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Togue Nana Dipanda Franklin
International Atlantic University AIU USA
Tiara Krstin A. Pasaribu
Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Abstract

This research is about impoliteness  strategy that is used in the hate-speech that is found on Basuki Tjahaja Purnama  (BTP) news in youtube. The writer want to explore Pragmatically, in the strategy of impoliteness that is found in hate-speech .This is a qualitative descriptive research design. Researchers observes the  language /expression of  hatespeech  used  in commentary by netizen in Youtube .The researcher identified the hate speech on BTP, and categorized them based on impoliteness from 54 sources,  There  are  five  types  of impoliteness expressions : they  are:  bald  on  record  impoliteness,  positive  impoliteness,  negative impoliteness, sarcasm and withhold politeness. The researcher found there are 51 haters  that commented  Ahok  using hate  -speech.  Those 51 haters  come  from  various  social  status.  The  most  dominant  hate  speech  that  addressed  to  Ahok is positive  impoliteness  type,  around   54,5  %  of  the  data using innapropriate identity markers, calling other names and so on. The second most dominant type is bald on record impoliteness, around 18,1 % of the data consist of threatening  which  addressed  to  BTP, and  the  rest  are 15.9% from negative impoliteness, 6,8% from sarcasm or mock politeness and 4.5 % from withhold politeness. There were six types of hate speech on social media addressed to Ahok, they are: insulting, 11,3 %, defamation 20.4%, , provocation 38.6%, blasphemy4.5%, objectionable 4.5% act, and intolerance 13.6%. The researcher found from  42 top commentary  from a few news video in youtube..the percentage   of hatespeech shows  that provocation 38.6% is the highest point, that provoke people to hate BTP, even by making defamation 20.4%, to move people to hate BTP .and it made BTP prisoned For 2 years.


 


Keywords  : Impoliteness, Indonesian Hate Speech, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
S. Manik, H. Pardede, T. N. Franklin, and T. Pasaribu, “IMPOLITENESS IN INDONESIAN HATE SPEECH ON BASUKI TJAHAJA PURNAMA (BTP) AS FOUND IN YOUTUBE COMMENTARY”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 420-429, Aug. 2022.
Issue
Vol 10 No 3 (2022): Vol.10. No.3 2022
Section
Artikel

References

Allan, K &Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.
Baryadi, P. (2012).Bahasa, kekuasaan, dankekerasan . Yogyakarta: University
Sanata Dharma.
Bodgan, R &Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education, An introduction to theory and method. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Coulthard, M. & Johnson, A. (2007). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence . London: Routledge.
Coulthard M. & Johnson A. (2010).The routledge handbook of forensic linguistics.
London: Routledge.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. UK: Lancaster University.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness & entertainment in TV quiz show. Lancaster: Lancaster University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fadhilah, R. (2018). Hate speech used by haters in social media. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Febriyani, M. (2018). Analisis factor penyebab pelaku melakukan ujaran kebencian (Hate speech) dalam social media. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Grice, P. (1967). Studies in the way of words. London: Harvard University Press.
Heffer, C. (2005). The language of jurytrial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia MarkasBesar, Surat edaran nomor: SE/6/X/2015 tentang penanganan ujaran kebencian (Hate Speech).Retrivied from www.hukumonline.com on 1 February 2015.
Komnas HAM Republik Indonesia. (2016). Buku saku penanganan ujaran kebencian.Jakarta.
Leech, G. (1983). Priciples of pragmatics . New York: Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, C.S. (1983).Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, C.S. (1987). Politeness: Some universal in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Litinen, M. (2010).The Use of Impoliteness Strategies in the American TV-Series House MD (Doctoral dissertation, Bachelor‘s Thesis).
McMenamin, G. (2002). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. London: CRC Press.
Miles M.B., Huberman, M.A., & Saldana, J.(2014). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
Mirhosseini, M., Mardanshahi, M., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2017). Impoliteness Strategies Based on Culpeper‘s Model: An Analysis of Gender Differences between Two Characters in the movie Mother. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(3), 221-238.
Nasution, M.F. (2014). Language impoliteness in Jakarta lawyers club talk show.STIE Labuhanbatu.
Panggabean, S. (2018). Praanggapan penyidik dalam interview investigatif (Kajian linguistic forensic dalam penyusunan berita acara pemeriksaan).The 11 th International Workshop and Conference of ASEAN Studies in Linguistics.
Pranowo.(2009). Berbahasa secara santun. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
Rangkuti, R. (2018). Problems in multicultural society: From language politeness to hate speech.Annual International Conference on Language and Literature UISU Medan
Shuy, R. (2002). Linguistic battles in trademark disputes.Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Siddiqui, S & Singh, T. (2016). Social media and its impact with positive and negative aspects. India: Mats University.
Simanjuntak, Y.P. (2015). Language hate speech gender in Indonesia lawak club (ILK) comedy program. Medan: State University of Medan.
Sinar, S. (2018).Functional features of forensic corruption case in Indonesia. Annual International Conference on Language and Literature UISU Medan
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D . Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tiersma P. (1999). Legal language, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Undang-UndangRepublik Indonesia No 11 Tahun 2008, Tentanginformasidantransaksielektronik.
Undang-UndangRepublik Indonesia No 19 Tahun 2016, Tentang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.
Watts, J.R. (2003). Politeness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldron, J. (2012). The harm in hate speech. London: Harvard University Press.
Yule, G. (2014). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.