KONTEKS PERUBAHAN DAN KEBERLANJUTAN KEBIJAKAN KEPEMUDAAN DI KABUPATEN CIANJUR SEBAGAI ANALISIS PERKEMBANGAN KELEMBAGAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF INSTITUSIONALISME HISTORIS

Main Article Content

Moch. Agung Lukmanul Hakim Karim Suryadi Cecep Darmawan Leni Anggraeni

Abstract

Teori Turbulensi Intermiten dari Mandelbrot tentang harmoni dualitas realitas ketidaksinambungan dalam analisis kebijakan menjadi analogi yang mencerminkan chaos dan order sebagai kuantum transenden, dimana potensi dan probabilitas yang berkaitan dengan perubahan ataupun keberlanjutan kebijakan sangat dimungkinkan melalui critical juncture dalam perlintasan waktu tertentu. Proses penelitian dengan pendekatan institusionalisme historis ini, mempunyai tujuan krusial menjalankan penyelidikan signifikansi dan implikasi dari trajektori perubahan dan keberlanjutan kebijakan kepemudaan pada lintasan waktu tertentu sebagai analisis perkembangan kelembagaan dalam menunjang transformasi pelayanan kepemudaan di Kabupaten Cianjur yang lebih kontekstual. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini merepresentasikan bahwa: (1) Bahwa setiap implementor dari kebijakan kepemudaan baik Disparpora, DPD KNPI, Karang Taruna Kabupaten maupun Gerakan Pramuka Kwartir Cabang Cianjur tidak secara ketat mencerminkan resistensi terhadap perubahan, yang biasa ditemukan sebagai konsekuensi rasional dari jalur kelaziman. (2) Sekalipun kondisi akumulasi bukti ilmiah, kebuntuan kebijakan kepemudaan dan guncangan bersifat eksternal telah memenuhi kualifikasi sebagai mekanisme dari perubahan kebijakan, namun tidak terdapat conjunctures yang menjadi hubungan interaksi antara seluruh implementor menimbang terdapat arah perubahan lingkungan strategis. (3) Melalui proyeksi perlintasan waktu empat tahun terakhir, tidak dapat diidentifikasi transaksi aktual persebaran ide perubahan kebijakan kepemudaan baik secara koersif maupun kooptatif dalam analisis jaringan sebagai pemerintahan. (4) Implementasi kebijakan sebagai kebijakan distingtif dari setiap implementor dengan trajektori repetitif pada perlintasan waktu tersebut, secara holistik menjadi variabel pengukuran dari inisiasi dan reproduksi kebijakan yang menunjukan seluruh implementor tidak mengalami self-reinforcing dan positive feedback dari berbagai dinamika kelembagaan. Bahwa implikasi dari penelitian ini telah menghadirkan pemetaan terkait konstruksi utama transformasi kebijakan kepemudaan berbasis analisis perkembangan kelembagaan.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
M. A. Hakim, K. Suryadi, C. Darmawan, and L. Anggraeni, “KONTEKS PERUBAHAN DAN KEBERLANJUTAN KEBIJAKAN KEPEMUDAAN DI KABUPATEN CIANJUR SEBAGAI ANALISIS PERKEMBANGAN KELEMBAGAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF INSTITUSIONALISME HISTORIS”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 420-436, Dec. 2022.
Section
Artikel

References

Alkire, S. & Jahan, S. (2018). The New Global MPI 2018: Aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: HDRO Occasional Paper. Diakses dari https://hdr.undp.org/content/new-global-mpi-2018-aligning-sustainable-development-goals.
Andersen, D. J., Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2019). The Dynamic Process Tracing Environment (DPTE) as a Tool for Studying Political Communication. Political Communication, 36(2), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1579771.
Arnot, M. & Swartz, S. (2012). Youth Citizenship and the Politics of Belonging: Introducing Contexts, Voices, Imaginaries. Comparative Education, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.637759.
Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional. (2019). Indeks Pembangunan Pemuda Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Bappenas.
Beach, D. & Pedersen, R.B. (2011). “What is Process-Tracing Actually Tracing? The Three Variants of Process Tracing Methods and Their Uses and Limitations”. Dalam APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Diakses dari https://ssrn.com/abstract=1902082.
Beach, D. & Perdersen, R.B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Beach, D. (2016). It's All About Mechanisms–What Process-Tracing Case Studies Should Be Tracing. New Political Economy, 21(5), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1134466.
Beghin, J., Meade, B., & Rosen, S. (2017). A food Demand Framework for International Food Security Assessment. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(5), 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.06.001.
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Bennett, A. (2009). Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective. Dalam J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady dan D. Collier (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (hlm. 702-721). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0030.
Berman, S. (1998) The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bleich, E. (2017). Historical Institutionalism and Judicial Decision-Making. World Politics, 70(01), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887117000272.
Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective On The Economic Consequences Of Population Change. Rand Corporation.
Blyth, M., Helgadottir, O., & Kring, W. (2016). Ideas and Historical Institutionalism. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 142-162). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.8.
Boychuk, G. (2017). “Studying Public Policy”: Historical Institutionalism and the Comparative Method. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 743-761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423916001220.
Brady, D. (1988). Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Capoccia, G. (2016). Critical Junctures. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 89-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.5.
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823-830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.
Çondur, F. & Şimşir, N.C. (2017). An Analysis of the Relationship Between Educational Expenditures, Economic Growth and Youth Unemployment in Turkey. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 2(6), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.306855.
Crasnow, S. (2017). Process Tracing in Political Science: What's The Story?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.002.
Cuervo, H. & Miranda, A. (2019). Youth in the Global South: An Introduction. Dalam H. Cuervo & A. Miranda (Penyunting), Youth, Inequality and Social Change in the Global South (hlm. 1-13). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3750-5_1.
De Bruijn, H. & Heuvelhof, E. (2002). Policy Analysis and Decision Making in a Network: How to Improve the Quality of Analysis and the Impact on Decision Making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(4), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154602781766627.
Devadoss, A.V. & Anand, M.C.J. (2013). Impact of Social Media on Youth Activism and Nation Building in Pervasive Social Computing using Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps (NCMs). International Journal of Computing Algorithm, 2, 257-262.
Disparpora Kabupaten Cianjur. (2018). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Cianjur: Disparpora Cianjur.
Disparpora Kabupaten Cianjur. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Cianjur: Disparpora Cianjur.
Disparpora Kabupaten Cianjur. (2020). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Cianjur: Disparpora Cianjur.
Disparpora Kabupaten Cianjur. (2021). Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Cianjur: Disparpora Cianjur.
Dowding, K. (2001). There Must Be End to Confusion: Policy Networks, Intellectual Fatigue, and the Need for Political Science Methods Courses in British Universities. Political Studies, 49(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00304.
Eisner, M.A. (1993). Regulatory Politics in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fairfield, T., & Charman, A. (2017). Explicit Bayesian Analysis for Process Tracing: Guidelines, Opportunities, and Caveats. Political Analysis, 25(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.14.
Falleti, T. G. (2016). Process Tracing of Extensive and Intensive Processes. New political economy, 21(5), 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1135550.
FAO. (2017). Methods for Estimating Comparable Prevalence Rates of Food Insecurity Experienced by Adults throughout the World. Roma: FAO. Diakses dari https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/2c22259f-ad59-4399-b740-b967744bb98d.
FAO. (2019). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019: Safeguarding Against Economic Slowdowns and Downturns. Roma: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/CA5162EN.
FAO. (2020). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020: Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. Roma: FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9692en.
Fioretos. Dkk. (2016). Historical Institutionalism in Political Science. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.1.
Flanagan, C.A. & Christens, B.D. (2011). Youth Civic Development: Historical Context and Emerging Issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.307.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). The End of History and the Last Man: Kemenangan Kapitalisme dan Demokrasi Liberal. Terj. M. H. Amrullah. Yogyakarta: CV. Qalam.
Fukuyama, F. (2010). Trust: Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran. Terj. Ruslani. Yogyakarta: CV. Qalam.
Fukuyama, F. (2016). The Great Disruption: Hakikat Manusia dan Rekosntruksi Tatanan Sosial. Terj. Ruslani. Yogyakarta: CV. Qalam.
Gambetta, D. & Sugden, R. (1995). The Sicilian mafia: The Business of Private Protection. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(2), 863-864. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729062.
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., & Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2017). Policy Analytics: Definitions, Components, Methods, and Illustrative Examples. Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61762-6_1.
Göçer, I. & Erdal, L. (2015). The Relationship between Youth Unemployment and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern European Countries. Karatekin University journal of the Faculty of Economcs et Admimistrative Sciences 5(1), 174.
Hacker, J.S. (2005). Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment. Dalam S. Wolfgang & K. Thelen (Penyunting), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hakim, M.A.L. (2022). Transformasi Kebijakan Kepemudaan dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Antara Prosedur, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan (Studi Pelayanan Kepemudaan di Kabupaten Cianjur) (Tesis). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Diakses dari http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/81183.
Hakim, M.A.L., Darmawan, C., & Anggraeni, L. (2022). Diskursus Kebijakan Kepemudaandalam Perspektif Behavioralisme dan Neo-Institusionalisme (Pendahuluan Studi Pelayanan Kepemudaan di Kabupaten Cianjur). Jurnal Education and Development, 10(3), 684-693. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v10i3.3733.
Hall, P.A. (2016). Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 31-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.2.
Hay, C. (2004). Taking Ideas Seriously in Explanatory Political Analysis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(2), 142-148.
Hay, C. (2016). Process Tracing: A Laudable Aim or A High-Tariff Methodology?. New political economy, 21(5), 500-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2016.1201806.
Hoppe, R. & Peterse, A. (1993). Handling Frozen Fire. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Howlett, M. & Mukherjee, I. (2018). The Contribution of Comparative Policy Analysis to Policy Design: Articulating Principles of Effectiveness and Clarifying Design Spaces. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1418223.
Huntington, S.P. (2012). Benturan Antar Perdaban dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia. Terj. Ruslani. Yogyakarta: CV. Qalam.
Jeffrey, C. & Mcdowell, L. (2004). Youth in a Comparative Perspective. Youth & Society, 36(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x04268375.
John, P. (2003). Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?. Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0072.00039.
Kay, A., & Baker, P. (2015). What Can Causal Process Tracing Offer to Policy Studies? A Review of the Literature. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12092.
Kementrian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan. (2022). Perlu Kerja Keras Bersama Untuk Tingkatkan Indeks Pembangunan Pemuda. Diakses dari https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/perlu-kerja-keras-bersama-untuk-tingkatkan-indeks-pembangunan-pemuda.
Kisby, B. (2007). Analysing Policy Networks. Policy Studies, 28(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870601121502.
Kittel, B., & Kuehn, D. (2013). Introduction: Reassessing the Methodology of Process Tracing. European political science, 12(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.4.
Lorentzen, P., Fravel, M. T., & Paine, J. (2017). Qualitative Investigation of Theoretical Models: The Value of Process Tracing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 29(3), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629816664420.
Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. (2012). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. Dalam J. Mahone & K. Thelen (Penyunting), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (hlm. 1-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003.
Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology Of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1), 120-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990220.
Mahoney, J. (2012). The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437709.
Mahoney, J. (2012). The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437709.
Mahoney, J. (2015). Process Tracing and Historical Explanation. Security Studies, 24(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1036610.
Mahoney, J. (2017). Shift Happens: The Historical Institutionalism of Kathleen Thelen. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(04), 1115–1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001494.
Mahoney, J., Mohamedali, K., & Nguyen, C. (2016). Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 71-88). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.4.
Mandelbrot, B. (1974). Intermittent Turbulence in Self-Similar Cascades: Divergence of High Moments and Dimension of the Carrier. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 62(2), 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112074000711.
Mandelbrot, B. (1975). On The Geometry of Homogeneous Turbulence, with Stress on the Fractal Dimension of the Iso-Surfaces of Scalars. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 72(3), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075003047.
Mandelbrot, B. (1976). Intermittent Turbulence and Fractal Dimension: Kurtosis and the Spectral Exponent 5/3+B. Dalam R. Temam (Penyunting), Turbulence and Navier Stokes Equations (hlm. 121–145). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0091452.
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1972). Possible Refinement of the lognormal Hypothesis Concerning the Distribution of Energy Dissipation in Intermittent Turbulence. Dalam M. Rosenblatt & C. Van Atta (Penyunting), Statistical Models and Turbulence (hlm. 333–351). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-05716-1_20.
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1999). Intermittent Free Turbulence. Dalam B.B. Mandelbrot (Penyunting), Multifractals and 1/ƒ Noise (hlm 292 – 293). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2150-0_13.
March, J.G. & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00247.
Marsh, D. & Rhodes, R.A.W. (1992) Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mikkelsen, M. (2006). Policy Network Analysis as a Strategic Tool for the Voluntary Sector1. Policy Studies, 27(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870500499868.
Muhaemin, N.M. (2021). Bonus Demografi Jawa Barat dan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah: Sudah Siapkah Jawa Barat?. Jurnal Academia Praja, 4(1), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v4i1.269.
Nicolis, G. & Prigogine, I. (1981). Symmetry Breaking and Pattern Selection in Far-From-Equilibrium Systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 78 (2) 659-663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.2.659.
Onwuka, E. dkk. (2020) Implications of Youth Unemployment and Violent Crime on the Economic Growth (A Case Study of Anambra State, Nigeria). Australian Journal of Commerce Study. Diakses dari https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660350.
Payne, G. & Payne, J, (2004). Key Consepts in Social Research. London: Sage Publication.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(02), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
Pierson, P. (2016). Power in Historical Institutionalism. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 124-141). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.7.
Prigogine, I. & Nicolis, G. (1985). Self-Organisation in Nonequilibrium Systems: Towards A Dynamics of Complexity. Dalam M. Hazewinkel, R. Jurkovich & J.HP. Paelinck (Penyunting), Bifurcation Analysis (hlm. 3–12). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6239-2_1.
Prigogine, I. (1978). Time, Structure and Fluctuations. Science, 201(4358), 777-785. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.201.4358.777.
Prigogine, I. (2000). The Networked Society. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6(3), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.203.
Purwanto, E.A. & Sulistyastuti, D.R. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Putra, F. & Sanusi, A. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Neo-Institusionalisme: Teori dan Praktik. Depok: Pustaka PL3ES.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006). Policy Network Analysis. Dalam R. Goodin, M. Moran & M. Rein (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (hlm. 425–447). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0020.
Ricks, J. I., & Liu, A. H. (2018). Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 842-846. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000975.
Rohlfing, I. (2013). Varieties of Process Tracing and Ways to Answer Why-Questions. European Political Science, 12(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.7.
Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2-3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An assessment. Dalam P. Sabatier (Penyunting), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P.A. & Pelkey, N. (1987). Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policymaking: An Advocacy Coalition Framework. Administration & Society, 19(2), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900205.
Sabatier, P.A., Hunter, S., & McLaughlin, S. (1987). The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents. Political Research Quarterly, 40(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298704000306.
Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schickler, E. (2001). Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schlager, E. & Blomquist, W. (1996). A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299604900311.
Schlager, E. (1995). Policy Making and Collective Action: Defining Coalitions Within the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000289.
Skocpol, T. & Pierson, P. (2002). Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. Dalam Katznelson I & Milner HV (Penyunting), Political Science: State of the Discipline. New York: W.W. Norton.
Sorensen, A. (2014). Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.874299.
Steinmo, S. (2016). Historical Institutionalism and Experimental Methods. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 107-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.6.
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Dalam S. Wolfgang & K. Thelen (Penyunting), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, K. & Conran, J. (2016). Institutional Change. Dalam O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti dan A. Sheingate (Penyunting), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (hlm. 51-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.3.
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369-404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369.
Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. Dalam J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Penyunting), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007.
Threadgold, S. (2019). Figures of Youth: on the very Object of Youth Studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1636014.
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow.
Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2010 tentang Gerakan Pramuka.
Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 217 tentang Penetapan Perpu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Ormas Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2009 tentang Kepemudaan.
Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa.
UNDP. (2019). 2019 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). New York: Illuminating Inequalities. Diakses dari https://hdr.undp.org/content/2019-global-multidimensional-poverty-index-mpi.
Urdal, H. (2006). A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 607-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00416.x.
Vanhala, L. (2017). Process Tracing in the Study Of Environmental Politics. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00434.
Weible, C.M. & Sabatier, P.A. (2007). A Guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Dalam F. Fischer, G.J. Miller & M.S. Sidney (Penyunting), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (hlm. 123-134). London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Wong, W. (2013). The Search For a Model of Public Administration Reform in Hong Kong: Weberian Bureaucracy, New Public Management or Something Else?. Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1653.
Woodman, D., Shildrick, T., & MacDonald, R. (2020). Inequality, continuity and change: Andy Furlong’s legacy for youth studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 23(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1704405.
Youniss, J. & Yates, M. (1999). Youth Service and Moral-Civic Identity: A Case for Everyday Morality. Educational Psychology Review (11), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022009400250.