TEACHER’S PERCEPTION OF IMPLEMENTING PEER FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING PERFORMANCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kegiatan penilaian sangatlah berkaitan erat dengan proses kegiatan pembelajaran yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Terdapat tiga proses dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar. Yaitu input, proses dan output. Penilaian teman sejawat memiliki peranan yang penting dalam sebuah proses pembelajaran bahasa Inggris, khususnya di ranah speaking. Input adalah siswa itu sendiri, proses berkaitan dengan kuriikulum, bahan ajar, maupun metode mengajar. Dan output adalah hasil dari sebuah pembelajaran. Penilaian terdapat pada ketiga ranah. Penilaian yang dilakukan sebelum proses belajar, pada saat pembelajaran dilakukan, maupun setelah pembelajaran dilakukan. Karena pentingnya faktor penilaian dalam pembelajaran, maka terdapat banyak bentuk penilaian selama pembelajaran berlangsung. Salah satu bentuk penilaian yang mendukung dalam proses pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di ranah speaking adalah kegiatan penilaian antar teman sejawat.
Beberapa peneliti percaya bahwa penilaian antar teman sejawat sangat berperan aktif dan bermanfaat bagi siswa maupun guru itu sendiri. Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mengevaluasi manfaat dari penilaian antar teman sejawat dan persepsi dari empat guru mata pelajaran di sebuah sekolah lanjutan tingkat atas sebagai bahan ajar dari hasil penilaian yang dilakukan oleh murid mereka. Data diperoleh dari melalui wawancara semi terstruktur yang berisikan pendapat, tantangan maupun manfaat dari pengaplikasian yang mereka peroleh dari metode penilaian peer feedback ini.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chien, S., Hwang, G. J., & Yung, J. M. S. (2019). Effects of Peer Assessment within the Context of Spherical Video-based Virtual Reality on EFL students ’ English-Speaking Performance and Learning Perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
Cisneros, C. P., & Ávila, M. R. R. (2022). Influence of Peer-Assessment on Speaking Skills. Peer Assessment for Speaking Skill, June, 19.
Davies, P. (2007). Peer assessment : judging the quality of students ’ work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467566
Duncan, N., Prowse, S., Wakeman, C., & Harrison, R. (2007). “Feed-forward”: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701510329
Hartley, J., & Chesworth, K. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative methods in research on essay writing: No one way. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 24(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/030987700112282
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. American Educational Research Association, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
Huxham, M. (2007). Fast and effective feedback: Are model answers the answer? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601116946
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Hyland, K. (2002). Directives : Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215
Li, F., Feng, Z., & Hou, Y. (2020). Case Study on Effectiveness of Oral Corrective Feedback in the Second Language Classrooms in Second Language Acquisition. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 9(7), 22–29. www.ijac.org.uk
Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer Feedback : The Learning Element of Peer Assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Learning targets: helping students aim fot understanding in todays’s lesson. ASCD.
Pat-El, R. J., Tillema, H., Segers, M., & Vedder, P. (2013). Validation of Assessment for Learning Questionnaires for teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02057.x
Sackstein, S. (2017). Peer Feedback in the Classroom: Empowering Students to Be the Experts. ASCD.
Sidiq, U., & Choiri, M. M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. CV. Nata Karya. http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN.pdf
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2014). Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate : A Step Towards Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Topping, K. (2014). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational in Colleges and Universities, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
Xu, Q., Chen, S., Wang, J., & Suhadolc, S. (2021). Characteristics and Effectiveness of Teacher Feedback on Online Business English Oral Presentations. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00595-5