FRAMING OF MANGROVE CONSERVATION IN THE EASTERN COAST OF SUMATRA: ECOLINGUISTICS STUDY
Article Sidebar
Published
Jan 10, 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the framing encapsulated in the news about mangrove conservation in the eastern coast of Sumatra. The research is important to shape public perception about mangrove because language plays a crucial role in shaping and influencing the general public. This research is also salient to raise the awareness and education about mangrove through ecolinguistics perspective. This research applied qualitative research and used grounded theory approach. The results of this research revealed that there are some frequent framings about mangrove conservation such as ecological framing, social and cultural framing, conservation framing, political and economic framing, and climate change framing
Article Details
How to Cite
[1]
M. Wardana and H. Hidayati, “FRAMING OF MANGROVE CONSERVATION IN THE EASTERN COAST OF SUMATRA: ECOLINGUISTICS STUDY”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 237-241, Jan. 2024.
Section
Artikel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, R., &Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011
Connell, B., Griffiths, S., Martin, M., Hayward, L., &Zeitlyn, D. (2021). Language ecology, language endangerment, and relict languages: Case studies from Adamawa (Cameroon-Nigeria). Open Linguistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0011
Fill, A. F., &Penz, H. (2017). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391
Fill, A., &Muhlhausler, P. (2004). The Ecolinguistics Reader. Language, Ecology and Environment. In Language & Communication (Vol. 24, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00015-0
Forte, D. L. (2020). Ecolinguistics: The battlefield for the new class struggle? International Ecolinguistics Association, 1–15. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal
Hulme, M., Obermeister, N., Randalls, S., &Borie, M. (2018). Framing the challenge of climate change in Nature and Science editorials. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0174-1
Kangas, T. S.-. (2021). Language Ecology. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method : Valid Research Strategies for Educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83–86. http://jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.com/articles/Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method.pdf
Ma, C., &Stibbe, A. (2022). The search for new stories to live by: A summary of ten ecolinguistics lectures delivered by ArranStibbe. Journal of World Languages, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0031
Mooney, A. (2021). Dirty or clean ?Frameworks for waste. 1–25.
Mühlhäusler, P., & Peace, A. (2006). Environmental discourses. In Annual Review of Anthropology (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123203
Pramudji. (2017). Ekosistemhutan mangrove dan peranannya. Oseana, XXVI(4), 13–23. http://www.litbang.pertanian.go.id/buku/membalik-kecenderungan-degrad/BAB-III-4.pdf
Stibbe, A. (2014). an Ecolinguistic Approach To Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics (A. Stibbe (ed.); First). Routledge.
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded Theory Approaches Used in Educational Research Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. In Sage Publication. Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600314007
Ubanako, V. N. (2022). An ecolinguistic analysis of ecocentrism in Cameroon newspaper discourse. Language and Ecology, 1–31.
Zaidi, S. B. (2022). Situating Sensitizing Concepts in the Constructivist-Critical Grounded Theory Method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211061957
Zeniakin, O. (2022). Framing the environment under the pandemic: The anthropocentric perspective (a case study of British online media). International Ecolinguistics Association, 1–17. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal
Zhang, R. (2022). The year ’ s work in ecolinguistics 2021. Journal of World Languages, 1–23.
Connell, B., Griffiths, S., Martin, M., Hayward, L., &Zeitlyn, D. (2021). Language ecology, language endangerment, and relict languages: Case studies from Adamawa (Cameroon-Nigeria). Open Linguistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0011
Fill, A. F., &Penz, H. (2017). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391
Fill, A., &Muhlhausler, P. (2004). The Ecolinguistics Reader. Language, Ecology and Environment. In Language & Communication (Vol. 24, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(02)00015-0
Forte, D. L. (2020). Ecolinguistics: The battlefield for the new class struggle? International Ecolinguistics Association, 1–15. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal
Hulme, M., Obermeister, N., Randalls, S., &Borie, M. (2018). Framing the challenge of climate change in Nature and Science editorials. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0174-1
Kangas, T. S.-. (2021). Language Ecology. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method : Valid Research Strategies for Educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83–86. http://jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.com/articles/Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method.pdf
Ma, C., &Stibbe, A. (2022). The search for new stories to live by: A summary of ten ecolinguistics lectures delivered by ArranStibbe. Journal of World Languages, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0031
Mooney, A. (2021). Dirty or clean ?Frameworks for waste. 1–25.
Mühlhäusler, P., & Peace, A. (2006). Environmental discourses. In Annual Review of Anthropology (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123203
Pramudji. (2017). Ekosistemhutan mangrove dan peranannya. Oseana, XXVI(4), 13–23. http://www.litbang.pertanian.go.id/buku/membalik-kecenderungan-degrad/BAB-III-4.pdf
Stibbe, A. (2014). an Ecolinguistic Approach To Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics (A. Stibbe (ed.); First). Routledge.
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded Theory Approaches Used in Educational Research Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211052203
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. In Sage Publication. Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600314007
Ubanako, V. N. (2022). An ecolinguistic analysis of ecocentrism in Cameroon newspaper discourse. Language and Ecology, 1–31.
Zaidi, S. B. (2022). Situating Sensitizing Concepts in the Constructivist-Critical Grounded Theory Method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211061957
Zeniakin, O. (2022). Framing the environment under the pandemic: The anthropocentric perspective (a case study of British online media). International Ecolinguistics Association, 1–17. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/journal
Zhang, R. (2022). The year ’ s work in ecolinguistics 2021. Journal of World Languages, 1–23.