THE URGENCY OF IMPLEMENTING PLEA BERGAINING IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Main Article Content

Itok Dwi Kurniawan Winarno Budyatmojo

Abstract

Plea Bargaining is a legal process in which a accused in the process of examining a criminal case voluntarily admits his guilt or is willing to admit his guilt or is willing to admit his guilt or several charges filed by the public prosecutor. This process aims to reach an agreement between the public prosecutor and the accused regarding the confession of sin and the sentence imposed, without going through a complete trial. Plea Bargaining was implemented for the first time in the United States which adheres to the common law legal system. Indonesia, through its KUHAP reform plan, intends to implement plea bargaining, but it has a different concept from that found in the United States. The writing of this article will analyze the concept of Plea Bargaining contained in the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code and the realization of protection for the rights of suspects and accuseds at every stage of the criminal investigation process. This article was written using a normative research method with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that the application of Plea Bargaining in criminal procedural law in the future will result in fair law enforcement and legal certainty if it pays attention to the rights of suspects and accuseds. The concept of plea bargaining in the draft KUHAP needs to be based on the principle of protecting the rights of suspects and accuseds.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
I. Kurniawan and W. Budyatmojo, “THE URGENCY OF IMPLEMENTING PLEA BERGAINING IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM”, JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 205-209, Jan. 2025.
Section
Artikel

References

Arfisadena, F. (2008). Peran Hakim Dalam Pemberian Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Korban Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Rasa Keadilan. In PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN PASTA LABU KUNING (Cucurbita Moschata) UNTUK SUBSTITUSI TEPUNG TERIGU DENGAN PENAMBAHAN TEPUNG ANGKAK DALAM PEMBUATAN MIE KERING (Vol. 8, Issue 1).
Aulia, M. Z. (2019). Hukum Pembangunan dari Mochtar Kusuma-atmadja: Mengarahkan Pembangunan atau Mengabdi pada Pembangunan? Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.363-392
Bryan, A., Garner, G., & et all. (2014). Black Law Dictionary. Dictionary.
Faisal, F., & Rustamaji, M. (2021). Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i02.p08
Gemilang, H. F., & Agustanti, R. D. (2023). Penggunaan Plea Bargaining dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Menyeimbangkan Efisiensi dan Keadilan. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(3).
Irmawanti, N. D., & Arief, B. N. (2021). Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227
Iskandar, I. (2023). Pre – Trial Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Untuk Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.vi.1947
Miswardi, Nasfi, & Antoni. (2021). Etika, Moralitas dan Penegak Hukum. Menara Ilmu, 15(2).
Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 13(1).
Montero Molera, A. (2023). Plea bargaining in the juvenile justice system. InDret, 1. https://doi.org/10.31009/indret.2023.i1.07
Muladi. (1995). Hak Azasi Manusia, Politik dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana析Title. In Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro (Vol. 10, Issue 1).
Mulyadi, L. (2012). UPAYA HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN DIKAJI DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.1-34
Nugroho, F. M., & Eskanugraha, A. P. (2023). Refleksi Asas Kemanfaatan: Mengilhami Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Tiada Kesalahan Tanpa Kemanfaatan. PUSKAPSI Law Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.19184/puskapsi.v3i1.40295
Nurdiansah, M. A. (2023). Penerapan Kebijakan Komutasi Pidana Mati Pada RKUHP Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(01). https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i01.150
Rahayu, S. (2015). Hak Tertuduh dalam Peradilan Pidana Berdasarkan Adversary System. INOVATIF | Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 8, No 1 (2015): INOVATIF.
Ramadhani, D. W., & Eriko, S. (2022). Studi Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1).
Susanti. (2018). Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press, 1986, hal. 3. UIB Repository.