MENEGOSIASIKAN RUANG DI PERBATASAN: PENGETAHUAN LOKAL DAN PRODUKSI SPASIAL OLEH MASYARAKAT ADAT NAPAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artikel ini mengkaji proses produksi ruang oleh masyarakat adat Napan yang hidup kawasan perbatasan Indonesia-RDTL. Bagi masyarakat adat Napan kawasan perbatasan bukan hanya tentang fungsi ekologis, tetapi juga merupakan entitas simbolik dan spiritual yang dipertahankan melalui sruktur sosial, sistem pewarisan marga, hukum adat serta praktik budaya kolektif. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis in-depth interview dan focus group discussion serta dianalisis melalui kerangka teori produksi ruang oleh Henri Lefebvre, artikel ini mengeksplorasi dinamika representasi ruang antara negara dan komunitas lokal. Negara memandang ruang melalui pendekatan teknokratis dan legal-formal, sementara masyarakat adat memproduksi ruang berdasarkan relasi historis dan simbolik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan kompleksitas cara pandang masyarakat terhadap ruang, dalam hal ini kawasan perbatasan karena itu pengakuan terhadap pengetahuan dan representasi spasial lokal menjadi hal yang patut dipertimbangkan terutama dalam perencanaan pembangunan.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Campion, M. (2018). The Construction of the Amazonian Borderlands through the longue durée: An Indigenous Perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1226926
Creswell John and Creswell David. (2023). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications,Inc.: Vol. Sixth Edit (Nomor 1). https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
de Abreu Santos, V. Á., & van der Borg, J. (2023). Cultural Mapping Tools and Co-Design Process: A Content Analysis to Layering Perspectives on the Creative Production of Space. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065335
Delaisse, A. C., Huot, S., & Veronis, L. (2021). Conceptualizing the role of occupation in the production of space. Journal of Occupational Science, 28(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1802326
Gardner, J. A., & Warren, S. D. (2024). Indigenous borders: contesting the nation-state, belonging and racialization. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 19(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2023.2275515
Hardy, C. (2012). Social space. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315565125-7
Kirsch, S. (2013). Cultural geography I: Materialist turns. Progress in Human Geography, 37(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512459479
Liliweri, A., Amah, M., & Andung, P. (2019). Cross Border Communication of Community: Case Studies in Napan (Indonesia) and Bobometo (Timor Leste). International Journal of Science and Reserarch Methodology, 12(3), 21–33. www.ijsrm.humanjournals.com
Luoma, M. (2025). Group-differentiated rights for Indigenous communities that straddle borders. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 28(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2024.2436264
Peña, S. (2023). From Territoriality to Borderscapes: The Conceptualisation of Space in Border Studies. Geopolitics, 28(2), 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1973437
Roluahpuia. (2024). Border Nation: Indigenous Peoples, State, and the Border in Indo-Myanmar Borderlands. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 39(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2022.2076250
Scott, J. C. (2021). Further reflections on seeing like a state. Polity, 53(3), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1086/714549
Whyte, K., Nelson, M. K., & Shilling, D. (2007). Whyte 2017. 1–20.
Wula, H. V. M., Atok, F., & Sitorus, D. R. H. (2024). Village Development Planning Model in the Border Region Between the Republic of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. Society, 12(2), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.601