EXPLORING STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF GRAMMAR FOCUSING ON DIGITAL TOOLS IN ENHANCING ACCURATE SENTENCE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS MAJORING ENGLISH AT TADULAKO UNIVERSITY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated undergraduate students’ perceptions toward the use of grammar-focused digital tools, particularly ChatGPT and Grammarly, in enhancing accurate English sentence construction. The research employed a qualitative design and involved seventh-semester English major students at Tadulako University. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants who had experience using grammar-focused digital tools in academic learning. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis based on Braun and Clarke’s framework. The findings revealed that students generally had positive perceptions of digital grammar tools. The tools were considered useful in identifying grammatical errors, improving sentence quality, supporting academic writing, increasing confidence, and enhancing grammar understanding through explanations and feedback. Students also used mixed language prompts, combining English and Indonesian, to improve comprehension while interacting with AI-based tools. However, several challenges were identified, including unstable internet connection, slow system performance, and reliability issues where suggested corrections did not always match the intended meaning or sentence context. The study concludes that grammar-focused digital tools can effectively support English language learning, particularly sentence construction, but students still need grammatical knowledge and critical thinking skills to evaluate AI-generated feedback critically.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227717854_Current_Issues_in_the_Teaching_of_Grammar_An_SLA_Perspective
Fitria, R. A., Sabarun, & Miftah, M. Z. (2022). Students’ perception of the use of Grammarly in undergraduate thesis writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijefl.v7i2.xxxx
Khider, A., & Othman, A. (2025). EFL Students ’ Perceptions on Using ChatGPT as an AI Tool for Developing Academic Writing Skills : A Case Study at University College of Haql. 14(3), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n3p18
Lee, S. (2023). University students’ perceptions of AI-based grammar tools in English writing courses. Journal of Language and Technology, 8(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jlt.v8i1.xxxx
Lee, Y. J., Davis, R. O., & Lee, S. O. (2024). University students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-based tools for English writing courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/call.2024.xxxx
Le, T. N. H. (2023). A Case Study on Using Presentation Software in Teaching and Learning Grammar for English-majored Undergraduates. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(3), 17. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23332
O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the efficacy of Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Pane, A. F., Kurniawan, A., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Students’ perception toward the use of Grammarly in writing academic texts. Journal of Language Education Development, 5(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jled.v5i2.xxxx
Prima, S., & Hartono, D. A. (2025). Exploring EFL Prompting Strategies of ESL Hospitality Students in Essay Writing with ChatGPT. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 12(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2025.vol12(2).24148