ANALISIS DAYA PEMBEDA BUTIR TES PILIHAN GANDA MATERI PERSAMAAN TRIGONOMETRI BERDASARKAN TEORI TES KLASIK
Abstract
This study aims to measure the distinguishing power of the multiple-choice form test items of class XI trigonometric equation material at SMA Mujahidin Pontianak. The object analyzed is 40 items of multiple-choice questions of trigonometric equation material. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative. The data collection method is a documentation method and the data obtained in the form of secondary data is then analyzed using a classical test theory approach. The results of the analysis showed that as many as 7 questions or 20.59% had bad distinguishing power criteria, 16 questions or 47.06% had sufficient discriminating power, 10 questions or 29.41% had good discriminating power criteria, 1 question or 2.94% had bad discriminating power, and no questions or as many as 0% had very good discriminating power. From the overall data, it can be concluded that the test items have a differentiating power that meets the feasible criteria because most of the questions have sufficient criteria.
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar. (2004). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Erfan, M., Maulydya, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Analitis Kualitas Soal Kemampuan Membedakan Rangkaian Seri dan Paralel Melalui Teori Tes Klasik dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3, 12.
Marisya, A., & Sukma, E. (2020). Model Discovery Learning pad Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu di Sekolah Dasar Menurut Pandangan para Ahli. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2189.
Muluki, A., Bandu, P., & Sukmawati. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Tes Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran IPA kelas IV Mi Radhiatul Adawiyah. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4, 91.
Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitaif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assesment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Tim Komunikata.
Susdelina, Perdana, S. A., & Febrian. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Pengukuran Pemahaman Konsep Persamaan Kuadrat Melalui Teori Tes Klasik dan Rasch Model. Jurnal Kiprah VI, 46.
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright to their articles. However, they grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.