PERBEDAAN RATA-RATA KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS SISWA YANG DIAJARKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL BERBANTUAN E-MODUL ETNOLINEAR BERBASIS ETNOMATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG
Abstract
This study aims to determine the difference in the average mathematical thinking ability of students taught by the PBL learning model assisted by an ethnolinear e-module based on ethnomathematics with the direct learning model. The research method used is quantitative, with a quasi-experimental design research form. The study was conducted at SMPN 2 Bae. The population of this study was 246 students. Sampling was carried out using random sampling techniques, namely classes VIII A and VIII D. Data collection techniques with mathematical thinking ability tests. Data analysis techniques using normality tests, homogeneity tests, N-Gain tests, and Mann-Whitney tests. Based on the results of the posttest of mathematical thinking skills, it was found that the average value of the mathematical thinking skills of students in the experimental class who were given treatment using the PBL model assisted by ethnolinear e-modules based on ethnomathematics was 63.71, higher than that of students in the control class who were given treatment using the direct learning model of 46.31, so it can be concluded that the average mathematical thinking skills of students who were taught the PBL learning model assisted by the Ethnolinear e-module were better than those taught the direct learning model.
References
Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran PBL Berbantuan Math Home Application
Dengan Pembelajaran Langsung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas
Mulawarman, 3, 64–72. https://jurnal.fkip.unmul.ac.id/index.php/psnpm
Caesariani, N. A. (2018). Pemanfaatan Multimedia Interaktif Pada Model Problem Based Learning (PBL)
Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2, 832–840.
Fajri, M. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran Abad 21 Di Sekolah
Dasar. Lemma: Letters of Mathematics Education, III(2).
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika (Anna (ed). Bandung: Pt
Refika Aditama.
OECD. (2023). Peringkat Indonesia pada PISA 2022. Kemendikbud. Diakses pada tanggal 26 September
2024 pukul 10.33 WIB. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan » Republik Indonesia
(kemdikbud.go.id
Pristiwanti, D., Badariah, B., Sholeh, H., & Dewi, R. S. (2022). Pengertian Pendidikan. Jurnal
Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.9498
Sari, W., nasriadi, A., & Salmina, mik. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Siswa
Menyelesaikan Soal Ujian Akhir Semester (UAS) Pada Tahun Ajaran 2020 Di SMAN 1 Teluk
Dalam Kabupaten Simeulu. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(1).
Sinaga, W., Parhusip, B. H., Tarigan, R., & Sitepu, S. (2021). Perkembangan Matematika Dalam Filsafat
dan Aliran Formalisme Yang Terkandung Dalam Filsafat Matematika. SERPEN : Journal of
Mathematics Education and Applied, 02(02).
Surur, M., & Tartilla, T. (2019). Pengaruh Problem Based Learning Dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling,
1(2). https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v1i2.96
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright to their articles. However, they grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.